< Back to LISTSERV archives

February 2008 Archives for IDM@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU

Options:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents
Search Archives

 

Table of Contents:

Active Directory as a general purpose directory service (7 messages)
anonymous binds to e-directory (25 messages)
Authentication Services Summary (1 message)
Call for Proposals: JA-SIG Presents "Higher Education Solutions: The Community Source Way!* (1 message)
CAMP documentation (3 messages)
Chicken or egg? (15 messages)
FW: Shibboleth and Active Directory (1 message)
guest policy (4 messages)
Higher Education Solutions: The Community Source Way! (1 message)
Listserv Change (1 message)
new email list for Sun Java System Identity Manager users (2 messages)
NIST 800-63 revision out for public comment (1 message)
Shibboleth and Active Directory (9 messages)
When the dust has settled... (4 messages)
[OT] Re: anonymous binds to e-directory (1 message)


Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date

Size

Active Directory as a general purpose directory service

Re: Active Directory as a general purpose directory service

Tim Crouch <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Feb 2008 10:27:49 -0600

77 lines

Re: Active Directory as a general purpose directory service

Barry R Ribbeck <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 Feb 2008 16:25:52 -0600

73 lines

Re: Active Directory as a general purpose directory service

Brendan Bellina <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 Feb 2008 14:17:30 -0800

69 lines

Re: Active Directory as a general purpose directory service

Jones, Mark B <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 Feb 2008 16:07:52 -0600

166 lines

Re: Active Directory as a general purpose directory service

Dustin Puryear <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 Feb 2008 16:03:35 -0600

64 lines

Re: Active Directory as a general purpose directory service

Jones, Mark B <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 Feb 2008 16:03:23 -0600

147 lines

Active Directory as a general purpose directory service

Dustin Puryear <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Feb 2008 16:43:23 -0600

38 lines

anonymous binds to e-directory

Re: anonymous binds to e-directory

Karla Borecky <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Feb 2008 08:12:02 -0500

55 lines

Re: anonymous binds to e-directory

Peter Schober <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Feb 2008 14:00:27 +0100

44 lines

Re: anonymous binds to e-directory

Schneider, William C <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 Feb 2008 14:50:10 -0600

103 lines

Re: anonymous binds to e-directory

Karla Borecky <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 Feb 2008 14:42:26 -0500

66 lines

Re: anonymous binds to e-directory

Peter Schober <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 Feb 2008 19:39:46 +0100

43 lines

Re: anonymous binds to e-directory

Karla Borecky <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 Feb 2008 11:43:31 -0500

69 lines

anonymous binds to e-directory

John C. Koen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 Feb 2008 09:22:47 -0600

34 lines

Re: anonymous binds to e-directory

William Couch <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Feb 2008 22:05:34 +0000

28 lines

Re: anonymous binds to e-directory

Peter Schober <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Feb 2008 22:37:54 +0100

21 lines

Re: anonymous binds to e-directory

Peter Schober <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Feb 2008 22:33:43 +0100

34 lines

anonymous binds to e-directory

John C. Koen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Feb 2008 15:15:32 -0600

34 lines

Re: anonymous binds to e-directory

Schneider, William C <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Feb 2008 13:32:59 -0600

23 lines

Re: anonymous binds to e-directory

Peter Schober <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Feb 2008 20:18:53 +0100

33 lines

Re: anonymous binds to e-directory

Luke Tracy <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Feb 2008 13:27:12 -0500

207 lines

Re: anonymous binds to e-directory

Jay Burrell <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Feb 2008 08:06:55 -0600

337 lines

Re: anonymous binds to e-directory

Barry R Ribbeck <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Feb 2008 10:31:18 -0600

148 lines

Re: anonymous binds to e-directory

Schneider, William C <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Feb 2008 17:14:04 -0600

91 lines

Re: anonymous binds to e-directory

Barry R Ribbeck <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Feb 2008 17:01:26 -0600

93 lines

Re: anonymous binds to e-directory

Schneider, William C <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Feb 2008 15:50:36 -0600

62 lines

Re: anonymous binds to e-directory

Karla Borecky <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Feb 2008 16:48:50 -0500

60 lines

Re: anonymous binds to e-directory

John C. Koen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Feb 2008 15:38:15 -0600

35 lines

Re: anonymous binds to e-directory

Brian Friday <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Feb 2008 18:10:49 -0800

71 lines

Re: anonymous binds to e-directory

Schneider, William C <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Feb 2008 16:03:16 -0600

73 lines

Re: anonymous binds to e-directory

Brendan Bellina <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Feb 2008 14:02:03 -0800

78 lines

anonymous binds to e-directory

John C. Koen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Feb 2008 15:40:54 -0600

40 lines

Authentication Services Summary

Authentication Services Summary

Eric Goodman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Feb 2008 17:04:54 -0800

173 lines

Call for Proposals: JA-SIG Presents "Higher Education Solutions: The Community Source Way!*

Call for Proposals: JA-SIG Presents "Higher Education Solutions: The Community Source Way!*

Ann West <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Feb 2008 10:53:24 -0700

103 lines

CAMP documentation

Re: CAMP documentation

Ann West <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Feb 2008 09:05:03 -0700

938 lines

Re: CAMP documentation

Ken Brumbaugh <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Feb 2008 13:53:53 -0600

224 lines

CAMP documentation

Jason Appah <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Feb 2008 10:19:18 -0800

803 lines

Chicken or egg?

Re: Chicken or egg?

Jones, Mark B <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Feb 2008 17:07:49 -0600

457 lines

Re: Chicken or egg?

Schneider, William C <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Feb 2008 13:58:11 -0600

351 lines

Re: Chicken or egg?

Tim Crouch <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 25 Feb 2008 23:05:46 -0600

311 lines

Re: Chicken or egg?

Jones, Mark B <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Feb 2008 11:25:52 -0600

327 lines

Re: Chicken or egg?

Dustin Puryear <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Feb 2008 10:56:39 -0600

199 lines

Re: Chicken or egg?

Tom Poage <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Feb 2008 08:35:39 -0800

38 lines

Re: Chicken or egg?

Jones, Mark B <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Feb 2008 10:32:16 -0600

240 lines

Re: Chicken or egg?

Dustin Puryear <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Feb 2008 15:53:48 -0600

137 lines

Re: Chicken or egg?

Tom Poage <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Feb 2008 10:49:42 -0800

127 lines

Re: Chicken or egg?

Reghardt Van der Rijst <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Feb 2008 13:05:06 +0200

140 lines

Re: Chicken or egg?

David Sowerby <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Feb 2008 09:33:19 +0000

295 lines

Re: Chicken or egg?

Schneider, William C <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Feb 2008 09:53:28 -0600

106 lines

Re: Chicken or egg?

Susan Bramhall <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Feb 2008 10:47:48 -0500

222 lines

Re: Chicken or egg?

David Sowerby <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Feb 2008 08:45:29 +0000

110 lines

Chicken or egg?

Tom Poage <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Feb 2008 11:03:32 -0800

61 lines

FW: Shibboleth and Active Directory

FW: Shibboleth and Active Directory

Mark Cruz <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 Feb 2008 11:11:26 -0800

524 lines

guest policy

Re: guest policy

Jones, Mark B <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Feb 2008 11:32:20 -0600

140 lines

Re: guest policy

Jones, Mark B <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Feb 2008 11:27:46 -0600

142 lines

Re: guest policy

Ken Brumbaugh <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Feb 2008 09:59:33 -0600

39 lines

guest policy

David Alexander <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Feb 2008 09:55:11 -0500

21 lines

Higher Education Solutions: The Community Source Way!

Higher Education Solutions: The Community Source Way!

Ann West <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 25 Feb 2008 11:44:41 -0700

387 lines

Listserv Change

Listserv Change

Peter B. DeBlois <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 16 Feb 2008 06:59:34 -0700

37 lines

new email list for Sun Java System Identity Manager users

Re: new email list for Sun Java System Identity Manager users

John Baines <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Feb 2008 12:11:28 -0500

223 lines

new email list for Sun Java System Identity Manager users

Robin Karlin <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Feb 2008 10:52:17 -0500

252 lines

NIST 800-63 revision out for public comment

NIST 800-63 revision out for public comment

RL 'Bob' Morgan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 Feb 2008 08:48:46 -0800

26 lines

Shibboleth and Active Directory

Re: Shibboleth and Active Directory

Mark Cruz <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Feb 2008 11:27:11 -0800

614 lines

Re: Shibboleth and Active Directory

Walsh, Alan J <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Feb 2008 10:32:24 -0500

242 lines

Re: Shibboleth and Active Directory

Schneider, William C <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Feb 2008 08:12:53 -0600

221 lines

Re: Shibboleth and Active Directory

Nate Klingenstein <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Feb 2008 04:42:07 +0000

30 lines

Re: Shibboleth and Active Directory

Caskey, Paul <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Feb 2008 22:37:13 -0600

207 lines

Re: Shibboleth and Active Directory

Barry R. Ribbeck <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Feb 2008 22:33:23 -0600

139 lines

Re: Shibboleth and Active Directory

Walsh, Alan J <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Feb 2008 23:15:16 -0500

667 lines

Re: Shibboleth and Active Directory

Schneider, William C <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Feb 2008 10:56:57 -0600

695 lines

Re: Shibboleth and Active Directory

Walsh, Alan J <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Feb 2008 11:38:24 -0500

559 lines

When the dust has settled...

Re: When the dust has settled...

Jones, Mark B <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Feb 2008 11:00:23 -0600

171 lines

Re: When the dust has settled...

Theresa Rowe <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Feb 2008 11:25:14 -0500

109 lines

Re: When the dust has settled...

Benn Oshrin <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Feb 2008 09:42:00 -0500

45 lines

When the dust has settled...

Reghardt Van der Rijst <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Feb 2008 14:41:17 +0200

61 lines

[OT] Re: anonymous binds to e-directory

[OT] Re: anonymous binds to e-directory

Peter Schober <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Feb 2008 14:25:49 +0100

34 lines


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Join or Leave IDM

Join or Leave IDM


Archives

September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
December 2005
October 2005
September 2005

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

Disclaimer: This listserv does not reflect the views of EDUCAUSE. These messages are only the opinion of the poster. The anonymity of the user cannot be guaranteed.