View LISTSERV archives

ITPSM@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU


View:

:

[

|

Previous Message

|

Next Message

|

]

:

[

|

Previous Message

|

Next Message

|

]

:

[

|

Previous Message

|

Next Message

|

]

:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

ITPSM Home

ITPSM Home

ITPSM  2006

ITPSM 2006

Subject:

Re: FW: [LICENSING] FW: [LICENSING] MSO Pro 2003 SP2 required for legal reasons?

From:

Debbie Nanni <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

The EDUCAUSE Software Licensing Issues Constituent Group Listserv <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Wed, 25 Jan 2006 14:31:28 -0500

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (89 lines)

Yes.  Thank you.  Debbie

Marg Knox wrote:
> Enoch has confirmed my interpretation.
> 
> Debbi, did I answer your question?
> 
> Regards, Marg
> 
> ____________________________________________
> 
> Margaret H. Knox       [log in to unmask]                        
> Director                      (512) 475-9224     
> The University of Texas 
> ITS- Collaboration & Academic Resources
> OTIS - System wide Strategies
> FAC 248 I (at Austin)78712
> CTJ 2.220 (System Admin.)78701 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Marg Knox [mailto:[log in to unmask]] 
> Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2006 12:21 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: [LICENSING] FW: [LICENSING] FW: [LICENSING] MSO Pro 2003
> SP2 required for legal reasons?
> 
> Debbi
> 
> That is how I read it. 
> 
> Once we get the updated media for student use and work-at-home employee
> use that has the fix, that is the media that must be distributed. Until
> then , we use the media we have and are in compliance.
> 
> I've copied Enoch in case I misunderstood. But I was the one who asked
> him about existing media issues etc so I feel pretty good about my
> interpretation of the answer; Microsoft went for the practical,
> fortuantely. 
> 
> I hope this helps.
> 
> Regards, Marg
> 
> ____________________________________________
> 
> Margaret H. Knox       [log in to unmask]                        
> Director                      (512) 475-9224     
> The University of Texas 
> ITS- Collaboration & Academic Resources
> OTIS - System wide Strategies
> FAC 248 I (at Austin)78712
> CTJ 2.220 (System Admin.)78701 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Debbie Nanni [mailto:[log in to unmask]] 
> Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2006 8:35 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: [LICENSING] FW: [LICENSING] FW: [LICENSING] MSO Pro 2003
> SP2 required for legal reasons?
> 
> Dear Marg,
> 
> Thanks for the ongoing updates.  I'd feel more comfortable if the 
> information on the WAH media were clearer.  The feedback from Enoch 
> Remick states, "Regarding Student and Employee WAH media, if you have 
> purchased and received media that does not include SP2 (or SP3), you are
> 
> not required to install SP2 (or SP3)."  Can we assume that the following
> 
> phrase is implied at the end of the quote?
> 
> "...even if the installation using the WAH media constitutes a new 
> implementation of the infringing version of the MS Office software."
> 
> Thanks,
> Debbie Nanni

-- 
Deborah L. Nanni, Ph.D.
Computer Services
169 Holland Street
Somerville, MA 02144
617-627-2889 (phone)
617-627-3699 (facsimile)
[log in to unmask]

**********
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Join or Leave ITPSM

Join or Leave ITPSM


Archives

2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
2012
2011
2010
2009
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998

ATOM RSS1 RSS2