We use Sun's Identity Manager, but we really don't use real time feeds.
Our PeopleSoft app runs a nightly DB dump (SQR) of user records that
we transfer to our local database. Then Sun IM iterates over new/
changed records and updates them.
We looked at doing direct "real-time" provisioning but we skipped that
for a few reasons:
1) DB table lookups provides less coupling between DB table structures
on each "side" of the interface.
2) Our SIM data is compiled from data in multiple tables, most of
which have effective-dated values, making it difficult to write a
simple query to pull and calculate values (e.g., distinguishing a
current student from an applicant from a barred student requires
querying several different tables and comparing the values with
precedence rules to handle potential conflicting statuses).
3) Much of our PeopleSoft Campus Solutions processing happens in bulk
anyway, so even if we read real-time, some amount of our data
(actually, most by quantity) would still be effectively bulk anyway.
Identity Management Project Manager
1156 High Street
UC Santa Cruz
Santa Cruz, CA 95064
[log in to unmask]
On Apr 29, 2009, at 10:41 PM, Allan Brinckmann wrote:
> At the University of Cape Town we've been live for 4 years with the
> Novell Identity Manager and eDirectory solution for our IDM
> PeopleSoft Campus Solutions is linked on an event-driven basis with
> the identity vault using some custom code (to identify the
> significant events) and standard Novell drivers. We use SAP for
> HR; the integration there is not event-driven and was more difficult
> on the SAP side.
> We are very satisfied with the integration; in fact UCT is
> recognized as a "customer success story" by Novell, see
> www.novell.com !
> Allan Brinckmann
> Manager, Administrative Computing Services
> University of Cape Town www.UCT.ac.za
> Office: +27 (0)21-650-3089
> Mobile: +27 (0)83-404-4846
> [log in to unmask]
> >>> On 27 April 2009 at 08:56 PM, Amos Gouaux <[log in to unmask]
> > wrote:
> I was curious to see what IdM frameworks folks have selected to use
> along with PeopleSoft for
> students. We *may* also be looking at PeopleSoft for HR, but I
> don't think that's been resolved
> yet. How has your selection worked out? What did it take to
> implement your selection? (Folks can
> reply directly to me if they prefer.)
> We've had an in-house system for quite a long while, but from time
> to time the wind blows for
> change. I think this time it'll happen.